{"catalog_version":"2026-10-12b","reviewed_at":"2026-09-01T04:00:00Z","review_mode":"editorially verified public-content flow; not real-time X ingestion","governance":{"allowed":"Publicly reachable source URL, attributable author/operator or official site, evidence-based tier, stated practical use and risk boundary.","excluded":"Unverified contract addresses, private-message solicitation, private-key/seed requests, guaranteed-return claims, paid signals and content without verifiable provenance.","tier_boundary":"Community content never inherits official identity; translations describe this directory card only and do not claim that an external source has a translated original."},"filters":{"tier":"all","category":"all","language":"all","locale":null,"q":"","page":1,"page_size":6},"total":36,"page_count":6,"items":[{"id":"tool-tapeout-canvas","wallet_risk":"connects_wallet","access":"open","category":"design","tier":"official","operator":"TapeOut Protocol","url":"https://tapeout.net/","original_language":"en","reviewed_at":"2026-10-09T09:34:00Z","title_en":"TapeOut Canvas: design, self-check, and choose where it burns","title_zh":"TapeOut Canvas：设计、自检，并选择烧在哪里","summary_en":"The protocol's own browser workspace for building NAND and LATCH logic before any tape-out. Re-checked on 2026-09-21 at tapeout.net, which is the protocol's own domain: the canvas still sits behind the #canvas route and the landing page is still a project market, listing 1,012 projects with 227 on sale, 4 graduated and 4 marked official at that reading -- 920 and 161 two days earlier, so both counts have grown while the graduated and official counts have not moved. The market has also grown a second tab labelled X Layer and Base, holding 77 listings that the page itself marks Test phase: 58 read on X Layer and are priced in OKB, 19 read on Base and are priced in ETH, while the page footer still names BNB Smart Chain alone. This site reads the BNB Smart Chain contracts only and has verified none of those 77 on their own chains. The market now also publishes its ranking rule: a project reaches the On sale tab only with a supply cap of at least 10,000, a price of at least 0.00001 BNB and at least one transistor minted, and Graduated additionally requires 0.01 BNB in total sales, which is stated as the reason a dust price cannot mint out a whole supply and count as graduated. Inside the canvas a design tree holds named circuits, examples load a 4-bit adder, an 8-bit adder, an 8-bit multiplier or a 4-bit CPU, and a properties panel counts input and output pins, gates at this level, state elements and netlist bytes, ending in a self-check that says whether the design is ready. Before signing it shows the netlist itself and how many transistors the tape-out will burn. One field deserves attention: the destination is an editable address. At that reading, connecting filled it with your own project if you had one and the official project otherwise, and the page said you may type a different address to tape out somewhere else -- which means the transistors can be burned into a project that is not yours and not the protocol's. Re-checked on 2026-09-24, and two things inside the canvas have changed. It now asks which chain to tape out on -- BNB Smart Chain, X Layer or Base -- so the other two chains are no longer only a market tab; this site still reads the BNB Smart Chain contracts alone and has checked nothing about a tape-out on the others. And the note beside the destination now says only that connecting fills in your own project if you created one and that you may edit the address to tape out somewhere else; it no longer mentions falling back to the official project. The field is still editable, so the warning above stands. The market has grown to 1,043 projects with 443 on sale, graduated and official still 4 each, and the menu has gained an entry for creating a container. One new label is worth noting: the first project in the list, a Keccak-256 hashing processor built by a community creator, now carries a Certified badge on the protocol's own site. Re-checked on 2026-10-07, after the protocol replaced its site. tapeout.net now opens a new single-page app that keeps every view at the same address, so there is no longer a direct link to the canvas: open the site and choose Canvas from its menu, which is why this entry now links the site itself. The previous site, the one described above, moved to tapeout.net/old, where its canvas is still reached at /old/#canvas and still has the editable destination field. The new canvas keeps the parts tray, the 4-bit adder, 8-bit adder and 8-bit multiplier examples -- the 4-bit CPU example is not among them -- the per-level properties and the self-check, and adds opening and exporting a design file, importing a BLIF netlist and saving the design locally. Two changes matter before signing. The netlist counter now shows its ceiling, 34,000 bytes. And the destination is no longer an address you type: the tape-out panel asks you to choose a processor from a list that shows each one's remaining supply, unit price and circuit count, and states that the tape-out burns that processor's transistors while the circuit NFT is yours. A list removes the pasted-address risk this entry warned about, on the new site, but not the choice itself: it includes community processors as well as official ones.","summary_zh":"协议自有的浏览器工作区，用于在流片前搭建 NAND 与 LATCH 逻辑。2026-09-21 在 tapeout.net（协议自有域名）复核：画布仍位于 #canvas 路由，站点首页仍是<b>项目市场</b>——该次读到时共 1,012 个项目、227 个在售、4 个已毕业、4 个标为官方；两天前是 920 与 161，也就是总数与在售都在增长，而毕业数与官方数没有变化。市场还多了一个标着 <b>X Layer 与 Base</b> 的分页，里面有 77 个条目，页面自己把它们全部标为<b>「测试阶段」</b>：58 个写着 on X Layer、以 OKB 计价，19 个写着 on Base、以 ETH 计价；而页面底部署名的链仍然只有 BNB Smart Chain。本站只读取 BNB Smart Chain 上的合约，这 77 个条目没有任何一个在它们自己的链上被本站核验过。市场现在还公开了自己的<b>排名规则</b>：一个项目要进入「在售」分页，供应上限至少 10,000、单价至少 0.00001 BNB、且至少已铸出一枚晶体管；「已毕业」还额外要求累计销售额达到 0.01 BNB——页面给出的理由是，否则一个灰尘价就能把整个供应铸完并算作毕业。画布内有按名称组织的设计树，示例可直接载入 4 位加法器、8 位加法器、8 位乘法器或 4 位 CPU；属性面板统计输入/输出引脚数、本层门数、状态元件数与网表字节数，并给出「自检通过、可以流片」的结论；签名前它会显示网表本身与<b>本次流片将烧掉多少晶体管</b>。有一个输入框值得特别注意：<b>流片目标是一个可编辑的地址</b>。那次读到时，连接钱包后它会自动填入你自己的项目（若你创建过），否则填入官方项目；页面同时说明你可以改成别的地址流片到别处——也就是说，晶体管可能被烧进一个既不属于你、也不属于协议方的项目里。2026-09-24 复核，画布里有两处变了。一是现在会问<b>流片到哪条链</b>——BNB Smart Chain、X Layer 或 Base——另外两条链不再只是市场里的一个分页；本站仍只读取 BNB Smart Chain 上的合约，对另外两条链上的流片<b>什么都没有核查</b>。二是目标栏旁的说明现在只写「连接后自动填入你自己的项目（若你创建过），要流片到别处就改这个地址」，<b>不再提及回退到官方项目</b>。这一栏仍可编辑，上面的提醒依然成立。市场已增长到 1,043 个项目、443 个在售，已毕业与官方仍各 4 个；菜单里还多了一个「创建容器」入口。另有一个新标签值得记下：列表第一位——一个由社区创作者搭建的 Keccak-256 哈希处理器——现在在协议自己的网站上带着<b>「Certified」（已认证）</b>标记。2026-10-07 复核，此时协议已经<b>换了新站</b>。tapeout.net 现在打开的是一个新的单页应用，所有视图都停留在同一个网址，因此<b>不再有直达画布的链接</b>：打开网站后从菜单选「画布」——所以本条目现在链接的是网站本身。上文描述的旧站搬到了 <b>tapeout.net/old</b>，它的画布仍可从 /old/#canvas 打开，目标地址栏<b>仍可编辑</b>。新画布保留了元件栏、4 位加法器 / 8 位加法器 / 8 位乘法器三个示例（<b>不再有 4 位 CPU 示例</b>）、本层属性与自检，并新增了打开 / 导出设计文件、导入 BLIF 网表和本机自动保存。签名前有两处变化要知道：网表字节计数现在标出了<b>上限 34,000 字节</b>；而目标不再是手填的地址——流片面板要你<b>从处理器列表里选一台</b>，列表显示每台的剩余供应、单价和电路数，并写明流片会消耗这台处理器的晶体管、电路 NFT 归你。在新站上，列表去掉了本条目提醒过的「粘贴错地址」风险，但选择本身还在：<b>列表里既有官方处理器，也有社区处理器</b>。","use_cases":["design","test","tapeout"],"safety_en":"Test before you sign: a tape-out is an irreversible transaction that consumes transistors, and the canvas shows the exact count beforehand. Check the destination every time. On the current site it is chosen from a list of processors that includes community ones as well as official ones, so confirm which processor you picked; the previous canvas at /old still has a pre-filled, editable address field, where a pasted or altered address sends your burn into someone else's project. Confirm the pins, the gates, the netlist bytes and the transistor count in the wallet prompt against what the canvas showed, and treat a passing self-check as a check of shape, not a promise about what the circuit earns. Read the market's counters twice as well: on a first load this site saw the line \"Only 12 of 1012 projects are loaded\" with 0 under On sale and 0 under Graduated, and the real counts of 227 and 4 appeared only after the list finished loading, so a zero on a half-loaded page is not an answer. The Test phase listings and any tape-out on the other chains are outside what this site checks; nothing here says whether those contracts do what their names suggest.","safety_zh":"签名前先测试：流片是不可逆的交易，会消耗晶体管，而画布在事前就把数量显示出来了。<b>每次都看清流片目标</b>：新站上目标是从处理器列表里选的，列表里也有社区处理器，要确认选中的是哪一台；/old 上的旧画布仍是一个可预填、可编辑的地址栏，被粘贴或改动过的地址会把你的烧录送进别人的项目。在钱包弹窗里逐项核对引脚数、门数、网表字节与晶体管数是否与画布显示的一致；并且要明白，自检通过只是对形态的检查，不是对这枚电路能挣多少的承诺。市场的计数也要多看一遍：本站第一次打开时看到的是「1012 个项目中只载入了 12 个」，此时「在售」与「已毕业」都显示 0，直到列表载完才变成 227 与 4——<b>半载入页面上的 0 不是答案</b>。另外两条链上那些「测试阶段」条目、以及在那两条链上的流片，都不在本站的核查范围内；本站没有说过那些合约是否真做它们名字暗示的事。"},{"id":"tool-pod","wallet_risk":"connects_wallet","access":"open","category":"proof_of_design","tier":"official","operator":"TapeOut Protocol","url":"https://tapeout.net/pod/","original_language":"en","reviewed_at":"2026-10-09T10:37:00Z","title_en":"$BEM Proof of Design: the official mining page, and the backup it expects you to keep","title_zh":"$BEM Proof of Design：官方挖矿页，以及它要你自己保管的那份备份","summary_en":"The protocol's own mining page on its own domain, read again on 2026-09-21 at 06:20 UTC. It explains what each button signs -- arm reserves an anchor, start begins mining and runs sampling, claim withdraws rewards, claimable at any time with no lock-up -- and states that connecting only reads your address and sends no transaction, with a free read-only reconcile against the chain. It shows network figures live; at that reading, 7,200 BEM emitted a day, 17,971 active miners of which 17,346 verified, 208,183.68 BEM minted in total, 111.86 permanently forgone, a verified-to-unverified pool split of 99 to 1, pool weights of 1,486,228 against 41,938, and 267 tasks in the bank. Two days earlier the same counters read 17,708 miners, 17,086 verified and 194,631 minted, while the permanently-forgone figure has not moved between the two readings. One requirement a miner should know before starting: originality proof depends on a local JSON salt backup, and the page says that after changing devices or clearing browser data you must import that backup, which it then verifies on chain before mining. The page also publishes the contract addresses it wants you to trust and warns that addresses arriving by direct message are fraudulent. This site has now read all three on chain. The BEM token address it lists is the same contract this monitor reads price and trades from. The mining pool address is the same contract this site watches and reports as sealed: read again today, it is a 130-byte proxy whose implementation slot is set while its admin and beacon slots are empty, owner() returns the zero address, isSealed() returns true and paused() returns false. The third, labelled read-only on the page, carries 16,324 bytes of its own code, has none of the three standard proxy slots set, and answers none of owner(), admin(), paused() or isSealed() -- consistent with the read-only label, though with no published source the absence of those functions is strong evidence rather than proof. Re-checked on 2026-10-07, after the protocol replaced its site. The page described above is still served at tapeout.net/pod/, unchanged, but the new site at tapeout.net has its own mining view, reached from its menu rather than by a link, and its rules tab publishes several parameters the old page did not show: a hard cap of 21,000,000 BEM; a halving period of 126,000,000 seconds, about 3.995 years, with the first halving dated 19 August 2030; the processor factor P in the hashpower formula, 6 on Behemoth and 1 on TapeOut; at least three spot-check vectors per claim, fixed in the contract; an anchor valid for 64 blocks; a cooldown of 1,200 blocks after stopping; and revocation by submitting a single vector the circuit gets wrong, with no stake required. It also states that tapeouts made through the new site commit automatically. The same menu now offers a rig bridge that parks a mining circuit in a vault on BNB Smart Chain against a transferable voucher on X Layer: the circuit keeps mining on BNB Smart Chain, and its rewards go to whoever holds the voucher at the moment a claim is started. That is recorded here as a fact about the official site, not as a recommendation; this site reads the bridge contracts and their owners on a panel of its own.","summary_zh":"协议在自有域名上的挖矿页，2026-09-21 06:20 UTC 再次读取。它写明了每个按钮到底在签什么——arm 预留锚点、start 开始挖矿并进行抽样、claim 提取奖励，且随时可领、无锁仓——并说明连接钱包只读取地址、不发送交易，另有一个免费的只读「与链上核对」功能。页面实时显示全网数据；该次读到的是：每日发行 7,200 BEM、活跃矿机 17,971 台（其中 17,346 台已验证）、累计铸造 208,183.68 BEM、永久放弃 111.86、已验证池与未验证池之比 99 比 1、两池权重 1,486,228 对 41,938、题库共 267 题。两天前同样几个计数器读到的是 17,708 台矿机、17,086 台已验证、累计铸造 194,631；而<b>「永久放弃」这一项在两次读数之间没有动过</b>。有一项矿工在开始前就该知道的要求：<b>原创性证明依赖本地的一份 JSON salt 备份</b>，页面写明换设备或清除浏览器数据后必须导入该备份，它会在挖矿前于链上校验。页面还公布了它要你信任的合约地址，并警告<b>通过私信发来的合约地址都是诈骗</b>。本站现在把这三个地址在链上全都读过了：它列出的 BEM 代币地址，与本监控读取价格与成交所用的是同一个合约；<b>挖矿池地址正是本站一直盯着、并报为「已封印」的那个合约</b>——今天再读一次：130 字节的代理，实现槽有值而管理员槽与信标槽均为空，owner() 返回零地址，isSealed() 返回 true，paused() 返回 false；第三个在页面上标为「只读」，它自带 16,324 字节代码，三个标准代理存储槽全部为空，owner()、admin()、paused()、isSealed() 一个都不应答——<b>与「只读」这个标注相符，但由于没有公开源码，这些函数的缺席是有力证据而不是证明</b>。2026-10-07 复核，此时协议已经<b>换了新站</b>。上文描述的页面仍在 tapeout.net/pod/，没有变化；但新站 tapeout.net 有了自己的挖矿视图（从菜单进入，没有直达链接），其「规则」页公布了旧页面没有写出的几个参数：<b>硬顶 21,000,000 BEM</b>；减半周期 126,000,000 秒（约 3.995 年），<b>第一次减半在 2030 年 8 月 19 日</b>；算力公式里的处理器系数 P，<b>Behemoth 为 6、TapeOut 为 1</b>；每次认领至少抽检 3 条向量，写死在合约里；锚点有效期 64 个区块；停挖后冷静期 1,200 个区块；只要提交一条电路算错的向量即可撤销，<b>无需质押</b>。它还写明经新站流片会自动承诺。同一菜单里还多了<b>矿机跨链</b>：把正在挖矿的电路锁进 BNB Smart Chain 上的金库，在 X Layer 拿一张可转让的凭证；电路继续在 BNB Smart Chain 挖矿，收益发给<b>发起领取那一刻</b>持有凭证的人。这里只把它记为官网上的事实，<b>不是推荐</b>；本站另有一个面板读取这些跨链合约及其 owner。","use_cases":["pod","rules","contract-reference"],"safety_en":"Every button here signs a real, irreversible transaction with real funds, and none of the figures on the page is a promise of what mining returns. Keep the JSON salt backup somewhere you will still have it after a browser reset or a new device: without it the originality proof cannot be re-imported. Take the page's own warning seriously and take it further -- compare any address you are given, from any source, against the block explorer before you sign, because a launchpad project can legally carry the name BEM while being a different contract entirely. The page also warns in its own words that early liquidity is shallow and price moves can be extreme.","safety_zh":"这里的每个按钮都会签出真实、不可逆、动用真实资金的交易，页面上的任何数字都不是对挖矿收益的承诺。那份 JSON salt 备份请存在浏览器重置或换设备之后你仍能拿到的地方：没有它，原创性证明无法重新导入。页面自己的那句警告值得认真对待，并且应当更进一步——<b>无论地址来自哪里，签名前都先到区块浏览器上逐字核对</b>，因为发射台上的项目完全可以合法地叫作 BEM，却是另一个合约。页面还用它自己的话提醒：早期流动性很浅，价格波动可能极端。"},{"id":"tool-pod-taskbank","drift_profile":"none","drift_skip_reason":"the same document as tool-pod (tapeout.net/pod/), reached by an in-page view switch rather than a separate URL — there is no #pod-tasks element in the DOM, the hash drives an SPA route — so that entry's fingerprint already covers this one, and a second identical fingerprint would only queue the same change twice","wallet_risk":"connects_wallet","access":"open","category":"learning","tier":"official","operator":"TapeOut Protocol","url":"https://tapeout.net/pod/#pod-tasks","original_language":"en","reviewed_at":"2026-10-08T16:41:00Z","title_en":"PoD taskbank: every task, its reference cost, and the ones the gate excludes","title_zh":"PoD 官方题库：每道题的参考成本，以及被闸排除的那些","summary_en":"The official task catalogue inside the PoD page. Each task ships a synthesised, exhaustively checked reference implementation whose burn basis becomes K_task and whose cost becomes C_ref, both frozen on chain, and the list shows those two numbers per task beside the reference gate count and depth. It can be filtered by category (single gates through ALU predicates and sequential families), by difficulty from intro to expert, and sorted by K_task, reference gates or depth. Read on 2026-09-18: 306 tasks, 267 of them on chain, 222 combinational against 84 sequential, with reference totals of 15,381 NAND and 340 LATCH. The page also names something a task chooser needs and this entry did not previously carry: 32 trivial tasks are excluded by the deployment gate and listed by number, because a constant or a direct wire can pass all their published vectors, reach the quality ceiling and never be removable by challenge -- four of them being LFSRs whose specified output stays zero from an all-zero seed. Tasks that can be deployed carry a one-click tapeout button, which is a transaction, so this page is not only reading. Re-checked on 2026-09-20 against the task bank's own file: all seven figures above are unchanged, and the page itself asks for no account merely to read. The file also carries a reason for each excluded task, which is worth unpacking because the page gives only one example. The 32 fall into three groups: thirteen are pure wiring or negation, where the answer is the input rearranged; four output a constant for every published vector, which is the group the page names; and fifteen -- the largest -- are sequential tasks that take no input and whose published run ends before the sequence they specify comes round: nine counters modulo 18 to 50, eight of them checked over only 12 cycles; four LFSRs that repeat after 31, 63, 127 or 255 steps against a 16-cycle run; and an 8-bit free-running counter and an 8-bit Gray-code generator, both of period 256. So the vectors never get far enough to tell a real implementation from a lazy one. Eight of the 32 are LFSR variants split across two of those groups, four for the constant output and four for the short run, so a designer scanning the list for a familiar name should read the reason rather than the title. Re-checked on 2026-09-23: the page still shows the same seven figures. One correction to how this entry described the button, which an earlier version said was on every row: on the page it appears 267 times, which is exactly the on-chain count: the 306 tasks less the 32 excluded ones and the 8 sequential tasks the file lists as run off chain, one task being on both lists. So the tasks without a button are the ones that cannot be deployed from here. Re-checked on 2026-09-29 against the task bank's file: the seven figures are still unchanged, and this pass corrects how the short-run group was described, which an earlier version gave as LFSR periods alone when most of that group are counters.","summary_zh":"PoD 页面内的官方题库。每道题都附带一份已综合并穷举核验的参考实现：其燃烧基准成为 K_task、成本成为 C_ref，两者都在链上冻结；列表逐题显示这两个数值，以及参考实现的门数与深度。可按类别（从单门到 ALU 判定、再到时序题族）、按难度（入门到专家）筛选，并按题号、K_task、参考门数或深度排序。2026-09-18 读数：共 306 道题，其中 267 道已上链，组合题 222 道、时序题 84 道，参考实现合计 15,381 个 NAND 与 340 个 LATCH。页面还写明一件选题者需要知道、而本条目此前没有记载的事：有 32 道简单题被部署闸排除并逐一列出题号——因为一个常量或一根直连就能通过它们公布的全部向量、拿到质量上限，且永远无法被挑战移除；其中四道是 LFSR，在全零种子下其规定输出始终为零。可部署的题目带「一键流片」按钮，那是一笔交易，所以这一页并不只是阅读。2026-09-20 对照题库原始文件复核：上述七个数字<b>全部未变</b>，而页面本身仅供阅读时不索取账户。该文件还为每一道被排除的题给出了理由，值得展开说，因为页面只举了其中一例。这 32 道分成三类：<b>十三道是纯连线或取反</b>，答案不过是把输入重新排列；<b>四道对全部公开向量输出恒定</b>，正是页面点名的那一组；而<b>十五道（最大的一类）是没有输入的时序题</b>，官方向量在它们所规定的序列转完一圈之前就结束了：九道是模 18 到模 50 的计数器，其中八道只跑 12 拍；四道是 LFSR，要到第 31、63、127 或 255 步才重复，而向量只跑 16 拍；另有一个 8 位自由计数器和一个 8 位格雷码发生器，周期都是 256。所以向量根本跑不到能区分真实实现与偷懒实现的地方。这 32 道里有<b>八道是 LFSR 变体，分属其中两类</b>：四道因输出恒定、四道因拍数太短。所以在列表里按熟悉的名字扫题的人，<b>该读的是理由，不是标题</b>。2026-09-23 复核：页面仍是同样的七个数字；另需<b>更正本条目此前的一处说法</b>——旧版写「每一行都有」一键流片按钮。实际上该按钮在页面上出现 267 次，恰好等于「已上链」的数目：306 道题，减去 32 道被排除的，再减去文件列为链下运行的 8 道时序题，其中一道同时在两份名单里。所以没有按钮的，正是无法从这里部署的那些题。2026-09-29 对照题库文件复核：七个数字仍然未变；这次<b>更正了「拍数太短」那一类的描述</b>——旧版只写了 LFSR 的周期，而这一类里多数其实是计数器。","use_cases":["learning","pod","task-selection"],"safety_en":"Reading the list needs no wallet, but the one-click tapeout button on each deployable task sends a transaction and spends transistors, so read the task's verification requirements and the cost figures before pressing it. K_task and C_ref are the reference implementation's frozen numbers, not a promise about what your own design will cost or earn; a task label guarantees no reward and no token value. The 32 excluded tasks cannot be deployed at all -- check that list before picking one.","safety_zh":"阅读列表不需要钱包，但可部署题目上的「一键流片」按钮会发起交易并消耗晶体管，按下之前请先读清该题的验证要求与成本数值。K_task 与 C_ref 是参考实现被冻结的数字，不是对你自己设计的成本或收益的承诺；题目标签不保证任何奖励或代币价值。被排除的那 32 道题根本无法部署——选题前先看那份清单。"},{"id":"tool-bscscan-pod","wallet_risk":"read_only","access":"open","category":"verification","tier":"reference","operator":"BscScan","url":"https://bscscan.com/address/0x7E2E0DC66a3bD9103E69b766afA62d9f7b697b46","original_language":"en","reviewed_at":"2026-10-08T17:46:00Z","title_en":"BscScan: read the mining contract yourself, including its seal","title_zh":"BscScan：自己读挖矿合约，包括它的封印状态","summary_en":"The block-explorer page for the BEM mining contract, the address this catalogue points to whenever a claim about mining needs checking rather than believing. Under Read Contract the two calls that matter are owner() and isSealed(). This site re-read both directly from a public node on 2026-09-18: isSealed returns true and owner returns the zero address, which is what a sealed contract looks like -- it was sealed on 2026-09-14 through the timelock that used to hold it, and this monitor has recorded no change since. Nothing here needs a wallet. Two boundaries worth stating: the explorer serves an automated browser a bot check rather than the page, so the readings above come from a node and not from the page; and the same page offers a Write Contract tab, which does connect a wallet -- that is a different action from reading. Re-read on 2026-09-20: unchanged, and this monitor has recorded no change in either value since it began watching on 2026-09-17. This round also asked a question the word 'sealed' invites and this entry had not answered: sealed against what? The address is a 130-byte proxy, so the code that runs lives at a separate address of about 24 KB, and a zeroed owner on the proxy would mean little if someone else could point it somewhere new. Two standard storage slots say they cannot: the slot that would name a separate proxy administrator is empty, and so is the one that would point at a beacon, leaving the upgrade path in the logic itself where the zeroed owner governs it. Simulating the two standard upgrade calls without signing anything, from a stranger and from the wallet that owns other contracts in this ecosystem, every attempt reverts. So the seal covers the thing that matters -- nobody tested here can replace the code behind this address -- which is a stronger statement than owner() returning zero on its own.","summary_zh":"BEM 挖矿合约的区块浏览器页面。凡是关于挖矿的说法需要「核实而非相信」时，本目录指向的就是这个地址。在 Read Contract 下，真正要紧的两个调用是 owner() 与 isSealed()。本站 2026-09-18 直接从公共节点重读了这两项：isSealed 返回 true、owner 返回零地址——这正是一个已封印合约的样子；它于 2026-09-14 经原本持有它的时间锁执行封印，此后本监控未记录到任何变化。这里不需要钱包。两条边界值得写明：该浏览器对自动化浏览器返回的是机器人验证而不是页面，所以上面的读数来自节点、不是来自页面；同一页面另有 Write Contract 标签页，那是会连接钱包的——与阅读是两件事。2026-09-20 重读：两项读数均未变，且自 2026-09-17 开始监控以来本站<b>没有记录到任何变更</b>。本轮还回答了「封印」这个词本身引出、而条目此前没有回答的问题：<b>封住的到底是什么？</b>该地址是一个 130 字节的代理，真正运行的代码在另一个约 24 KB 的地址上——如果别人能把代理指向新的地方，那么代理上的 owner 归零就意义有限。两个标准存储槽说明了它不能：<b>本该记录独立代理管理员的槽是空的</b>，指向信标的槽同样是空的，于是升级路径留在逻辑合约内部、由那个已归零的 owner 把守。本站在不签名的前提下模拟了两个标准升级调用，分别以一个陌生地址、以及持有本生态其它合约的那个钱包发起，<b>每一次都 revert</b>。所以这道封印封住的正是要紧的那件事——<b>本站试过的任何人都无法替换这个地址背后的代码</b>——这比单看 owner() 返回零要强得多。","use_cases":["verification","read-only","contract-check"],"safety_en":"A block explorer is not an audit and not a return metric: it shows what the chain says, not whether the code is safe. Match any address you copy against the official source before using it, and treat the Write Contract tab as what it is -- a way to send transactions, not a way to read. A seal is specific: it says this contract's owner is gone, and nothing about any other contract in the ecosystem.","safety_zh":"区块浏览器不是审计结论，也不是收益指标：它显示链上是什么，不说明代码是否安全。复制任何地址前都应与官方来源比对；Write Contract 标签页是用来发交易的，不是用来阅读的。「封印」是有具体范围的说法：它只说明这一个合约没有了 owner，不涉及生态里的任何其他合约。"},{"id":"tool-tapeout-club","wallet_risk":"connects_wallet","access":"open","category":"marketplace","tier":"community","operator":"TapeOut Club","url":"https://tapeout.club/","original_language":"zh","reviewed_at":"2026-10-09T04:51:00Z","title_en":"TapeOut Club: a hashpower board that now runs a market too","title_zh":"TapeOut Club：算力看板，如今也自营市场","summary_en":"A community site that began as a hashpower and holdings board and now also runs a market. Its front page carries a live protocol pulse (miner count, the weight in the verified pool and in the unverified pool, daily $BEM output per weight point), leaderboards for hashpower, holdings and single circuits, a circuit-NFT appraisal tool, an inspector and a formulas page -- and beside them, buttons to trade transistors and circuit NFTs, which the site describes as a non-custodial market aggregating the official market with its own orders. The page asks an injected wallet for its chain and accounts as soon as it loads, which is why this entry is not marked read-only. Checked on chain on 2026-09-18 and again on 2026-09-23 with the same result: the circuit-NFT address it publishes is the official circuit-market contract this monitor reads its own sales from, while its own exchange contract 0x685631C9C20b88dFE71d7197789b4b5E8a62bFeD carries about 19 KB of code, is not an upgradeable proxy through the standard slot, is owned by a single externally owned wallet, and exposes a pause switch that reads false. The top of the front page promotes a hashing circuit built by the site's own creator, described as the first and so far only native Keccak-256 circuit on this chain. On 2026-09-20 this site went looking: the processor exists, and its circuit shapes fit the claim -- one is 1,600 inputs to 1,600 outputs at 17,920 gates, the size of the permutation at the heart of that hash, and another adds five inputs, the width a round counter needs, and behaves as a round with a per-round constant should. What this site could not do was reproduce the hash end to end: the padded empty message, fed through the 1,600-bit circuit under the two obvious bit orders, did not return the known digest, and that circuit maps an all-zero state to all zeros, which the full permutation cannot do. The likeliest explanation is that the hash is composed from several circuits under a packing convention the page does not document. Re-read on 2026-09-23, the promotion has grown. It now says the circuit is certified by the TapeOut official community, and that on chain it reproduces not only the hash of the empty string but ERC-20 function selectors and real block hashes of this chain; it adds that the same processor also carries ALU, ERC-20, EVM-stack, gas-metering, checksum-address and storage circuits that anyone can reference, and it links to the official site to mint. At that reading this site found no protocol record of such a certification, and did not re-test the hash. Correction, 2026-09-24: the protocol's own site does now show a Certified badge beside this processor, at the top of its project list, so the certification is visible on the protocol's side; that page does not say what the badge covers, and this site still has not reproduced the hash. The front page also gained a small directory of two other community sites, which it describes as independently run and unaffiliated with it. So the hashing claims are recorded as the operator's, with the circuit shapes confirmed and the digest not reproduced here. Re-checked on 2026-09-28, after the longest gap this monitor has seen from it. From 16:58 UTC on 2026-09-26 the whole site answered with Cloudflare's error 522 for about eighteen hours. When it came back on 2026-09-27, its public data file was still the snapshot generated at 15:44 UTC the day before, and it went on serving that snapshot for several more hours before it began regenerating again at 12:38 UTC. This monitor had been treating a successful fetch of that file as fresh data and called the day-old snapshot healthy; it now also reads the file's own generation time and marks the board stale when that stops moving for two hours. Its own sync records show the same kind of freeze earlier, from 08:17 UTC on 2026-09-23 to 01:43 UTC on 2026-09-25, when the site stayed up but its data did not move. At this reading the data had been generated 17 minutes earlier, the page asked a wallet probe for its chain and accounts as before, and the exchange contract was unchanged: owned by the same single wallet, not paused, and carrying the same 19 KB of code with the standard proxy slot empty.","summary_zh":"社区站点，起初是算力与持仓看板，现在同时自营市场。首页有实时协议脉冲（矿工数、已验证与未验证池权重、每点权重的每日 $BEM 产出）、算力榜、持仓榜、单电路排行榜、电路 NFT 鉴定、检查器与公式说明；就在这些旁边，是交易晶体管与电路 NFT 的入口，站方自述为非托管市场，聚合官方市场与自家订单。页面一加载就向注入的钱包询问链与账户——这正是本条目不标为「只读」的原因。2026-09-18 与 2026-09-23 两次上链核对，结果相同：它公布的电路 NFT 地址，就是本监控读取成交所用的官方电路市场合约；而它自家的交易合约 0x685631C9C20b88dFE71d7197789b4b5E8a62bFeD 约 19 KB 代码、未通过标准槽位做可升级代理、owner 是单个普通钱包，并带有暂停开关，读数为 false。首页顶部推广站长自己做的哈希电路，称其为本链上第一个、也是目前唯一的原生 Keccak-256 电路。本站 2026-09-20 去查过：处理器确实存在，电路形状与说法吻合——其中一枚是 1,600 入、1,600 出、17,920 门，正是该哈希核心那个置换的规模；另一枚多出五路输入（恰好是轮计数器所需的位宽），行为也正是「带每轮常数的一轮」应有的样子。<b>本站没能做到的是端到端复现这个哈希</b>：把按规则填充的空消息按两种显而易见的位序送进那枚 1,600 位电路，都没有返回已知摘要；而且那枚电路把全零状态映射为全零——完整置换不可能如此。最可能的解释是：该哈希由多枚电路组合而成，且位打包约定页面并未说明。2026-09-23 再读，推介又加码了：现在称该电路<b>获得「TapeOut 官方社区认证」</b>，并称链上不仅能复现空字符串的哈希，还能复现 ERC-20 函数选择器与本链真实区块哈希；还说同一处理器上另有 ALU、ERC-20、EVM 栈、Gas 计量、校验和地址与存储等电路，任何人都能引用，并附上前往官网铸造的链接。那次本站没有找到任何关于这种认证的协议记录，也没有重新测试这个哈希。<b>2026-09-24 更正</b>：协议自己的网站现在确实在其项目列表首位、这个处理器旁边显示<b>「Certified」（已认证）</b>标记，因此这项认证在协议方一侧是看得到的；但该页面没有说明这个标记覆盖什么，本站也仍未复现这个哈希。首页另新增一个小型导航，列出另外两个社区站点，并自述彼此独立运营、互不隶属。因此这些哈希相关说法按<b>运营方自述</b>记录：电路形状已核实，摘要本站未能复现。2026-09-28 复核，此前经历了本监控见过的它最长一次中断。自 2026-09-26 16:58 UTC 起，整站返回 Cloudflare 的 522 错误，持续约十八小时。2026-09-27 恢复访问时，它公开的数据文件<b>仍是前一天 15:44 UTC 生成的快照</b>，又照样提供了几个小时，直到 12:38 UTC 才重新开始生成。本监控此前把「成功抓到这个文件」当作「数据是新的」，把那份隔天的快照报告为健康；现在还会读取文件自带的生成时间，<b>生成时间两小时不动就把榜单标为过期</b>。本站自己的同步记录显示，更早也有过同类停滞：2026-09-23 08:17 UTC 至 2026-09-25 01:43 UTC，站点一直能打开，数据却没有更新。本次读取时，数据是 17 分钟前生成的；页面仍在加载时询问钱包探针所在的链与账户；交易合约没有变化——仍由同一个钱包持有、未暂停、代码仍是约 19 KB，标准代理槽为空。","use_cases":["hashpower","processor-observation","trade"],"safety_en":"Trading here connects a wallet and asks for signatures; the site says it takes no custody, and this entry does not verify how any individual order settles. One wallet owns its exchange contract and that contract can be paused, so reaching your own open orders depends on that key -- though the code behind it is not upgradeable through the standard proxy slot. Its leaderboards, projected outputs and labels remain one operator's computation rather than protocol facts, and the same page promotes its own creator's circuits; the protocol's own site labels that processor Certified without saying what the label covers; its mint link leads to the official site, where minting costs BNB. Its data has twice stopped updating for more than a day while the page stayed up, so a figure here can be old without looking old.","safety_zh":"在这里交易需要连接钱包并签名；站方自述不托管资产，本条目不核验任何一笔订单如何结算。其交易合约由单个普通钱包持有 owner，且可被暂停，因此你能否继续操作自己挂出的订单取决于那把钥匙——不过该合约的代码不是通过标准代理槽可升级的。榜单、预计产出与标签仍属一方推算，不是协议事实；同一页面还在推广其创作者自己的电路；协议官网给该处理器标了「Certified」，但<b>没有说明这个标记覆盖什么</b>；其铸造链接通往官网，在那里铸造要花 BNB。它的数据曾两次在页面照常打开的情况下停更超过一天，所以这里的数字<b>可能已经过时却看不出来</b>。"},{"id":"tool-tapeout-firsto","drift_profile":"structure","wallet_risk":"connects_wallet","access":"open","category":"marketplace","tier":"community","operator":"Firsto","url":"https://tapeout.firsto.ai/","original_language":"zh","reviewed_at":"2026-10-08T15:26:00Z","title_en":"TapeOut Firsto marketplace","title_zh":"TapeOut Firsto 晶体管与矿机市场","summary_en":"Third-party trading terminal for TapeOut transistors, circuits and $BEM, run by Firsto. Its market pages carry a live per-fill trade tape -- direction, BNB total, quantity, unit price, counterparty wallet and a BscScan link for every fill -- and a /data/bem section publishes its own $BEM analytics, including two views not published elsewhere we have seen: where each day's claimed $BEM went (held, sold, added to liquidity, or moved and still held) and a holder-distribution breakdown with top-holder shares and a Gini coefficient. By 2026-09-18 it also offered taping out, mining and claiming $BEM from its own pages, a guide that covers how to recognise a dangerous signature request, and provenance labels on each processor (official mining, verified on the official site, community) that are Firsto's labelling, not the protocol's. Re-checked on 2026-09-23, it has grown again. There is now a flow for opening a container for a circuit you hold, which states that Firsto charges no service fee, that only the protocol fee and gas are paid, that control of the container follows the circuit NFT, and that the button requests a single open transaction. A recovery page looks up circuits that were created but never started and matches them against the official task bank; its checking stage is read-only. A $BEM spot page shows a trade tape that includes liquidity added and removed. The circuit market now prices every listed circuit against its own estimate of how much $BEM that circuit produces in 24 hours, and ranks listings by a price per unit of daily output; a companion circuit-data page charts that figure alongside supply, listing share and holder concentration by hashrate, and labels itself an exclusive calculation. The guide now publishes a fee schedule: no fee for making a listing, 1% for taking one, and no Firsto fee for taping out, $BEM spot trades, approvals, transfers or claims, with gas shown separately by the wallet. The wallet label still fits and was tested, not assumed: opened with a wallet probe attached, the page asks an injected wallet which chain it is on and which accounts it exposes before anything is clicked, and its buying, listing, tape-out, container and claim flows all sign. A comparison made on 2026-09-20 still stands as a lesson: for the same token on the same day, its analytics counted liquidity across two pools, this monitor's on-chain reading counted four, and a third-party aggregator counted one; the prices agreed to within a cent. The spread came from which pools were counted, not from any disagreement about the market. Re-checked on 2026-09-27: it now keeps a public updates page that says it holds every notice and product change it has published, revised or withdrawn, and the latest product note there changes what a sale signs. When one of your single or batch circuit listings fills, the same transaction now also claims that circuit's unclaimed $BEM for you as the seller, and your claim history marks it as claimed on fill; bids, the unified buy-order market and official-market listings are not covered yet. A separate orders page lists your orders once a wallet is connected. Re-checked on 2026-10-08: the updates page has one newer product note, dated 2026-10-01, about cancelling and history. The transistor market gains a one-click batch cancel; the circuit market gains a one-click cancel entry that, as the note itself says, still needs a wallet confirmation for each order; the tape-out and container pages gain a history of enhanced assemblies and container openings; and the fills page gains the seller's unrevealed committed quantity and the latest best-bid records, which the note says are for reference and do not mean the next trade will get the best price. The rest of the page matches the earlier readings: it asks the wallet which chain and which accounts before anything is clicked, the provenance labels on processors are still Firsto's own, and the fee line still reads zero Firsto service fee on tape-out with the protocol fee shown separately. Its fonts load from a third-party font service. Nothing was signed here.","summary_zh":"Firsto 运营的第三方交易终端，覆盖 TapeOut 晶体管、电路与 $BEM。市场页带一条实时逐笔成交流水——每一笔都给出方向、总 BNB、数量、单价、对手方钱包与 BscScan 链接；/data/bem 板块发布它自己的 $BEM 分析，其中两项是我们在别处没见过的：每日 Claim 的去向（原地址持有、已卖出、已加流动性、转出后持有），以及带头部占比与基尼系数的持仓分布。到 2026-09-18 时，它已支持在站内流片、挖矿与领取 $BEM，提供一份讲如何识别危险签名请求的指南，并为每个处理器标注来源（官方挖矿 / 官网已认证 / 社区）——这是 Firsto 自己的标注，不是协议方的。2026-09-23 复核，它又扩展了：新增<b>为你持有的电路开通容器</b>的流程，页面写明 Firsto 不收服务费、只付官方协议费与 Gas、容器控制权跟随电路 NFT 转移、按钮只会请求 1 笔 open 交易；新增「恢复未启动的电路」页，查找已创建但未启动的电路并按官方完整题库匹配，<b>检查阶段只读</b>；新增 $BEM 现货页，成交流水里连加减流动性也列出。电路市场现在<b>为每一枚挂单电路估算「24 小时预计产出多少 $BEM」</b>，并按「日产能价」（每单位日产出的价格）排序；配套的电路数据页把这个数字与供给、挂单占比、按算力计的持仓集中度画在一起，并自标「Firsto 独家计算」。指南里公布了收费表：挂单 0%、吃单 1%，一键流片、BEM 现货、授权、转账与领取均不收 Firsto 服务费，Gas 由钱包另行显示。钱包标签仍然合适，而且是实测而非默认：带钱包探针打开，页面在你点任何东西之前就询问注入的钱包当前在哪条链、暴露了哪些账户；其买入、挂单、流片、开通容器与领取流程都需要签名。2026-09-20 做过的一次对照仍值得记住：同一天、同一代币，它的数据页按两个池算流动性，本站链上读数数到四个池，第三方聚合器只算一个；三者价格相差不到一美分。<b>差距来自算了几个池子，而不是对行情有分歧。</b>2026-09-27 复核：它新增了一个公开的<b>更新记录页</b>，自称保存所有已发布、修订和撤回的通知与产品更新；其中最新一条产品更新<b>改变了卖出时签的那笔交易做什么</b>：你的单电路或批量电路挂单成交时，同一笔交易会顺带替你这个卖家领取该电路尚未领取的 $BEM，「领取记录」里标为「成交代领」；出价（Bid）、统一买单市场和官方市场挂单暂未覆盖。另有一个「我的订单」页，连接钱包后列出你的订单。2026-10-08 复核：更新记录页多了一条 2026-10-01 的产品更新，讲的是撤单与历史记录。晶体管市场新增<b>一键批量撤单</b>；电路市场新增一键撤单入口，但站方自己写明<b>仍需钱包逐笔确认</b>；流片与容器页新增增强组装和容器开通的历史记录；「我的成交」新增卖家未揭示的承诺数量和最近最优委托记录，站方写明这些仅供参考，<b>不代表下一笔交易一定能得到最优价格</b>。页面其余部分与之前的读数一致：在你点任何东西之前就向钱包询问当前链与账户，处理器上的来源标签仍是 Firsto 自己的标注，费用一栏仍写流片 Firsto 服务费为 0、官方协议费另列。它的字体来自第三方字体服务。本站没有签署任何东西。","use_cases":["market-discovery","listing-reading","ecosystem","analytics"],"safety_en":"Community marketplace, not an official price or ownership source. Listings, displayed prices and availability can change and do not guarantee execution; verify contracts and signing requests independently. Its per-circuit 24-hour output estimates and the price-per-daily-output ranking built on them are Firsto's own model, not protocol figures and not a promise of what a circuit will earn; this site does not adopt them. The /data analytics are computed by this operator with methodology it does not publish, so treat every figure there as one party's reading of the chain -- particularly the claim-destination split, which depends entirely on how it decides an address sold, pooled or merely moved its $BEM. Opening a container and taping out are paid transactions: read the protocol fee and the gas in the wallet before confirming.","safety_zh":"社区市场，不是官方价格或持仓来源。挂单、显示价格和可用性会变化，且不保证成交；应独立核验合约与签名请求。它为每枚电路给出的「24 小时预计产出」以及据此排出的「日产能价」，<b>是 Firsto 自己的模型，不是协议数据，也不承诺一枚电路能挣多少</b>；本站不予采纳。/data 下的分析由该运营方自行计算、口径未公开，因此那里的每个数字都应视为一方对链上的读数——尤其是 Claim 去向的拆分，它完全取决于该方如何判定一个地址是卖出、加池还是仅仅转移了 $BEM。开通容器与流片都是<b>要付费的交易</b>：确认前先在钱包里看清协议费与 Gas。"}]}